Evaluating Drug Interactions with UGT Enzymes

Understanding how a drug interacts with drug metabolizing enzymes is essential for understanding its behavior in the body and assessing the associated drug-drug interaction risk. UDP glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes are the second most common enzyme family involved in the metabolism of marketed drugs, following CYP450s.1,2 Therefore, assessing a new drug candidate’s interaction with UGT enzymes is often necessary in the drug development process.

UGTs catalyze the glucuronidation of their substrates, either exogenous or endogenous compounds by attaching them to UDP-glucuronic acid (UDP-GlcA). This conjugation makes the compounds more polar and thus more water-soluble, facilitating their excretion in urine and bile. While glucuronidation, a Phase II metabolic process, generally detoxifies compounds (for example, xenobiotics or their Phase I metabolites), some glucuronide metabolites retain biological activity.

The UGT family consists of membrane-bound microsomal enzymes that differ in terms of catalytic function, regulation, and tissue expression. These enzymes are predominantly expressed in the liver but are also found in the kidney, GI tract, lungs, prostate, mammary glands, skin, brain, spleen, and nasal mucosa.3 Currently, 17 human UGTs have been identified and categorized into two families (UGT1 and UGT2) based on the sequence identity of the encoded proteins. Of these, 7-9 main UGTs have been identified to play a role in drug metabolism.4

In case the formation of glucuronide metabolites is observed for an orally administered drug, it is essential to identify the responsible UGT enzymes. Assessment of the impact of first-pass metabolism, including this glucuronidation, on the drug’s bioavailability is also essential. Substrates to metabolic enzymes can also act as their inhibitors, and drugs that don’t undergo glucuronidation themselves may still impact UGT function (via UGT inhibition or induction), leading to potential side effects or drug interactions. Regulatory agencies, including the ICH M12 Harmonized Guideline for Drug Interaction studies, now require in vitro UGT inhibition testing not only for compounds that undergo glucuronidation themselves but also in case a new molecule is expected to be co-administered with known UGT substrate drugs.5

Regulatory Requirements for UGT-mediated DDI

Drug-drug interactions (DDI) via UGT inhibition or induction can pose significant risks to drug safety. This is exemplified by the withdrawal of several drugs from the market, or their use has been restricted due to the significant impact of the DDI on drug exposure relative to the associated therapeutic window. The ICH M12 guidelines for drug-drug interaction assessment, while not mandatory, recommend assessing interactions with UGT enzymes as part of drug development.5 A test compound may be an inhibitor, inducer, or substrate of these enzymes. These interactions, potentially leading to DDI risk, are usually assessed from the hit-to-lead stage up to the development stages before clinical trials.

The ICH M12 guidelines emphasize the need to identify metabolic enzymes involved in ≥ 25% drug elimination. Consequently, if glucuronidation is a major elimination pathway, the individual UGT enzymes involved should be identified in UGT substrate assays. If a candidate drug’s major elimination route is via glucuronidation, testing its potential for UGT inhibition is also recommended. For UGT non-substrate drugs, UGT inhibition assessment is still relevant if they will be administered alongside a drug that is cleared via glucuronidation to rule out UGT-mediated DDI and related complications later in development. While UGT induction in DDIs remains less understood, the ICH M12 guidelines mention that these enzymes are regulated via the Pregnane X Receptor (PXR), a mechanism shared with several other metabolic enzymes and transporters that may be involved in DDI.

Specifications of our UGT phenotyping, UGT inhibition, and UGT induction assays are described below.

UGT Assay Availability

Available Assay SetupsScreeningMechanisticRegulatory
UGT Phenotyping 
UGT Inhibition
UGT Induction 

Consult an Expert

UGT Phenotyping Assay

UGT phenotyping is essential for identifying which UGT enzymes are involved if a drug candidate undergoes glucuronidation, as identified in metabolite profiling experiments. UGTs are the second most common enzyme family involved in the metabolic clearance of known small-molecule drugs after CYP450 enzymes. Of the several known UGT families, drug glucuronidation is almost exclusively catalyzed by the UGT1 and UGT2 families.6 UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A9, or UGT2B7 are among the most common enzymes responsible for metabolizing drugs, with the UGT2B7 being most often involved.7 However, additional UGTs with more limited substrate specificities, e.g., UGT2B15, may still be involved in the clearance of certain drugs.7

The metabolic clearance of a drug depends on the activity and abundance of the relevant drug-metabolizing enzymes. Changes in the clearance rate may lead to systemic exposure outside of the therapeutic window, causing changes in efficacy or introducing toxicity. Genetic variance, environmental factors, and/or DDIs can affect the activity and expression of these enzymes. Drugs metabolized by the same enzyme can affect each other’s clearance rate, resulting in altered pharmacokinetics and potential changes in efficacy and effect. Regulatory drug-drug interaction assessment guidelines5 call for the identification of enzymes that contribute to ≥ 25% of drug elimination in case of considerable metabolic clearance (based on metabolic stability and mass balance studies).

UGT phenotyping is typically conducted using two complementary experimental approaches:

  • Chemical inhibition: Assesses the effects of specific UGT enzyme inhibitors targeting individual UGTs on the drug candidates’ metabolism in human liver microsomes. If the recovery of the drug candidate is increased upon inhibition, the enzyme in question is considered involved in the metabolism.
  • Recombinant enzyme: Uses recombinant cDNA expressed UGT enzymes to directly observe the enzyme’s impact on drug metabolism by following depletion of the candidate.

The UGT enzymes responsible for catalyzing the drug candidate’s metabolism can be most reliably identified using output from both experiments.

  • Technical specifications
    • Human liver microsomes or recombinant enzymes
    • Several UGT isozymes, including: UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17
    • UGT-selective chemical inhibitors to determine which enzyme(s) are involved in metabolism
    • Metabolite profiling and/or metabolite identification
    • Investigative or regulatory-compliant study setup

UGT Inhibition Assay

Drugs that might not undergo glucuronidation themselves may still inhibit UGT enzymes, leading to potential DDIs or adverse side effects. Furthermore, UGT substrates can also act as inhibitors of these enzymes, increasing their DDI potential. Therefore, regulatory agencies require assessment of UGT-mediated DDIs in vitro. The ICH M12 Harmonized Guideline for Drug Interaction Studies calls for in vitro UGT inhibition testing not only for compounds that might be glucuronidated but especially if the drug will be co-administered with UGT substrate drugs.5

Our in vitro UGT inhibition assays are designed to follow ICH recommendations using two different systems using (relatively) selective probe substrates.5

  • Recombinant UGT enzymes
  • Human liver microsomes

These systems offer complementary insights into how a drug might inhibit UGT enzymes. While microsomes more closely mimic physiological liver functions, the use of recombinant UGTs makes it possible to identify the involvement of each UGT specifically. The combination of both methods usually yields the most stringent data for DDI prediction. However, in the case of UGT2B15, it is not practical to examine UGT inhibition in human liver microsomes due to the overlapping selectivity of the substrates. This can be circumvented by using the recombinant UGT enzyme assay.

UGT inhibition data are presented on a relative scale with 100% defined under no-inhibition conditions. Results are plotted as inhibition of metabolite formation, and in case inhibition occurs, a decrease in enzyme activity. Thus, product formation can be observed. If a curve can be fitted based on enzyme kinetics, and at least 50% inhibition is reached, the IC50 (µM) value can be determined, defined as the TA concentration required to inhibit maximal activity by 50%. IC50 values for UGT inhibitors are usually in good correlation across systems (except for UGT2B15, where only recombinant enzymes are used), with results obtained using recombinant enzymes usually yielding slightly lower IC50 values as in this setup, no other metabolizing processes are present, and TAs can readily interact with the UGTs.

  • Technical specifications
    • Human liver microsomes or recombinant enzymes
    • Major UGT isozymes: UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15 and UGT2B17
    • Reversible inhibition
    • Initial screening assessments (% inhibition) or definitive determinations (IC50, Ki)
    • Activity of UGT enzymes measured via LC-MS/MS analysis
    • Drug-drug interaction experiments with known co-medications
    • Investigative or regulatory-compliant study setup
Digital collage of research-related images, including test tubes, liquid dropping from a pipette, drawings of molecular structures of organic compounds, and glass flasks in a laboratory setting
How to Evaluate UGT-Mediated DDI Risk
Learn about in vitro strategies for assessing UGT inhibition, induction, and substrate interactions, and how cross-species data can enhance predictivity.
Watch the Webinar


UGT Induction Assay

Drugs may also induce UGT enzymes, which can alter their metabolism and lead to changes in drug exposure. Assessing drug candidates for UGT induction is essential for understanding potential drug safety risks, and the data can inform labeling and dosage. Furthermore, regulatory agencies may require UGT induction testing if the drug is metabolized primarily by UGT enzymes.

Our UGT induction assay uses cryopreserved plateable hepatocytes to assess enzyme induction and gene expression levels and measure enzyme activity. On the gene expression level, induction is quantified by measuring mRNA levels of individual UGTs. Enzyme activity changes are assessed via incubation with a cocktail of selective probe substrates after which their possible respective metabolites are quantified by LC-MS. Emax and EC50 values are produced to estimate DDI risk and to determine whether follow-up clinical studies are required.

The assay format is also optimized to evaluate possible UGT-mediated glucuronidation of thyroid hormone thyroxine (T4) to support risk assessment and prediction for endocrine disruption studies.

  • Technical specifications
    • Multiple human UGT isoenzymes: UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B7, and UGT2B15
    • Multiple small animal UGT isoenzymes: UGT1A1, UGT1A5, UGT1A6, UGT1A7c, UGT2B1, UGT2B3, and UGT2B12
    • Enzyme catalytic activity or mRNA levels using human or rat cryopreserved hepatocytes
    • Gene expression of UGT isoforms measured via RT-qPCR
    • Catalytic activity of UGT isoforms measured via LC-MS/MS analysis, specific substrate (L-Thyroxine) or a general UGT substrate
    • Emax and EC50 determination
    • Human vs. rat comparative assay for endocrine disruption evaluation of thyroid hormone clearance

Consult an Expert


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About UGT Inhibition, Induction, and Phenotyping Studies

  • Is UGT inhibition assessment a regulatory requirement?

    To cite the ICH M12: “It is recognized that a drug which is not a substrate of an enzyme can still be an inhibitor. However, considering the generally limited magnitude of UGT inhibition-mediated DDIs, a routine evaluation of investigational drugs to inhibit UGTs may not be warranted. If direct glucuronidation is the major elimination pathway of an investigational drug, it is recommended to study in vitro whether the drug can inhibit UGTs. […] When an investigational drug will be commonly administered with a drug that is mainly metabolized by direct glucuronidation, it is recommended to evaluate in vitro the potential inhibitory effect of the investigational drug on the UGT isoform(s) responsible for the elimination of the other drug.”5

  • What test concentrations should be applied in UGT inhibition testing?

    To obtain an accurate concentration-dependent inhibition curve and possibly determine an IC50 value, compounds are typically studied over a 500-fold concentration range. For orally dosed compounds, the highest concentration should be 50x the total Cmax, in line with ICH M12 recommendations.5 Also, in the case of systemic drug administration, the highest recommended test concentration is 50x the total Cmax at steady state.

  • What common marketed drugs undergo glucuronidation?

    Many widely prescribed drugs undergo glucuronidation, including several opioid analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), anticonvulsants, and antiviral drugs. Approximately 10% of the top 200 prescribed drugs are metabolized via this pathway.1,2

  • References

    1Saravanakumar, Anitha et al. “Physicochemical Properties, Biotransformation, and Transport Pathways of Established and Newly Approved Medications: A Systematic Review of the Top 200 Most Prescribed Drugs vs. the FDA-Approved Drugs Between 2005 and 2016.” Clinical pharmacokinetics vol. 58,10 (2019): 1281-1294. doi:10.1007/s40262-019-00750-8

    2Cerny, Matthew A. “Prevalence of Non-Cytochrome P450-Mediated Metabolism in Food and Drug Administration-Approved Oral and Intravenous Drugs: 2006-2015.” Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals vol. 44,8 (2016): 1246-52. doi:10.1124/dmd.116.070763

    3Rowland, Andrew et al. “The UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: their role in drug metabolism and detoxification.” The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology vol. 45,6 (2013): 1121-32. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2013.02.019

    4Miners, John O et al. “Evidence-based strategies for the characterisation of human drug and chemical glucuronidation in vitro and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase reaction phenotyping.” Pharmacology & therapeutics vol. 218 (2021): 107689. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107689

    5Guideline, ICH Harmonised. “Drug Interaction Studies M12." Int. Counc. Harmon. Tech. Requir. Pharm. Hum. Use (2024).

    6Meech, Robyn et al. “The glycosidation of xenobiotics and endogenous compounds: versatility and redundancy in the UDP glycosyltransferase superfamily.” Pharmacology & therapeutics vol. 134,2 (2012): 200-18. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.01.009

    7Stingl, J C et al. “Relevance of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase polymorphisms for drug dosing: A quantitative systematic review.” Pharmacology & therapeutics vol. 141,1 (2014): 92-116. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.09.002

Upcoming Webinar